“It was difficult but it was possible”: Interview with Dr. Susan Blackmore

Written by February 2, 2012 10:37 pm 8 comments

Susan BlackmoreDr. Susan Blackmore is a freelance writer and lecturer based in England. She was involved in research in Parapsychology for years and then stopped doing it in 2000 when “careful experiments showed that there were no psychic phenomena – only wishful thinking, self-deception, experimental error and occasionally, fraud.” Dr. Blackmore was in Chennai, India recently and on 25.1.2012, she gave a talk on “Mysteries of the Mind” at The Rationalists’ Forum, Periyar Thidal. I interviewed her for a few minutes just before the talk and she answered the questions with admirable involvement and passion.

This is the edited transcript of the interview.


Good evening Dr. Susan Blackmore.
Could you tell us about your journey from being a believer in the paranormal to becoming a skeptic. How difficult was it?

I had an amazing Out of Body Experience once after I had smoked some dope and it seemed to me that there was something more out there. It looked like I was going down a tunnel towards a bright light. I felt some spirit went out of my body and roamed around and it actually seemed so real and so intense. I became so involved in this and I wanted to know more. I wanted to prove all my lecturers wrong as I thought there was more to mind, beyond the brain. So I started studying Parapsychology. But when I started my experiments and it showed no evidence, it was quite difficult. All the results could be explained as chance and when I investigated other claims it turned out to be not true either. Sometimes it was even fraud. It amounted to changing everything about what I thought; but you know, I was more interested in truth than anything else. It was difficult but it was possible! And when it is done once, it is easier to do it again. So I was no longer frightened of being wrong. Whenever I had a theory or I was trying out an experiment and it turned out to be wrong, I told myself ‘Okay I will do it again.’

So has it happened? Have you found out again that you have been wrong on some other occasions?

Oh yes! I had tried various theories of Consciousness and I found that I was wrong. But I kept moving on. Because that is what Science is all about. You find out one thing and you build on that; but when you go wrong, you start again. It is always changing.

After your fascinating Out of Body Experience, you decided that you wanted to study Parapsychology against the advice of your lecturers and other researchers. And you had invested a lot of yourself, in terms of time, money and ego in your research. So when you were confronted with evidence, rather the lack of it, what was your initial reaction? How did you find the courage to keep going?

Yes of course, my lecturers did advise. But well, I did not believe that I could be wrong. Initially I thought if that does not work, I am sure this does. And if this doesn’t then may be this does; so I was always looking for something that would work. I kept on thinking, ‘just this once more I would experiment,’ because I had built a lot of hope. But then it failed again and again. And then there came a point when, I can even remember where I was – in my house, in the bath, when I thought: ‘What if it is all rubbish? What if none of it is true?’ That was a very hard moment to come to. But I just had to get on to the truth.

So are you saying it was one final dawning moment?

Yes, I think so. I kept on building and building and at one point, phut… everything fell down. I suppose it was made harder by the fact that I had given up the possibility of a career. I had made myself unemployable, atleast that was what I thought; it actually turned out not so bad after all. But I didn’t care…I didn’t care about any of that, you know. I just wanted to find out.

Geetha T.G. interviews Susan Blackmore

Coming to Memetics, why do some Memes survive and spread while some do not? Is there an equivalent for fitness like in genes?

Yes I think so. Fitness is very complex. Some memes survive because they are true or good or beautiful or useful. Others survive because they parasitize us; because they get themselves into our minds and stay there and pass on. I suppose it is like bacteria. Some bacteria survive because they harm us; some because they help us. A meme embeds itself in the brain and survive through us; memes use the human brain as carriers.

How do you think the meme of ‘Atheism’ can spread against the contrary meme of ‘Religion’ which is quite well-entrenched?

If I knew that I’d be spreading it as often as I could. So I don’t know the answer. Part of the answer is teaching children comparative religion. When my two children were small they had religious education in school. One week they’d study Buddhism, the next, Islam, the next Hinduism, and they’d quickly conclude that all of them can’t be true. That simple conclusion starts a general scientific approach and scientific enquiry develops. That spirit of inquiry would hopefully inform all aspects of life.

Define Consciousness – How would you suggest we explain it in simple terms to someone who thinks Consciousness survives Death.

There is no one generally accepted definition of Consciousness. ‘What it is like to be me; who I am; why do things look like this and feel like this.’ You can say it is awareness; it is subjectivity. So it covers all from being in here and experiencing the world. I think that if we ever fully understand Consciousness, that would undermine religion in a big way.

Legalization of Drugs – Don’t you think subsequent enforcement of regulations would be very difficult and there would be several cases of addiction.

If all the recreational drugs in Britain and the US were made legal, I think addiction would drop. That is only a guess. But what we know for sure is that crime would drop dramatically – there would be no gang wars; the prisons would only be half full. Imagine what it would mean to have only half the number of prisoners and those there are in the prisons we would be able to rehabilitate. Imagine the poor farmers in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in South America who are terrorized by gangs running the drug trade – they would be able to sell their drugs legally to us, to be able to sold in shops in correct doses and with regulations. Children would have true education about drugs and would be told the truth instead of being told lies you know instead of being just told ‘say no to drugs.’ I hope children would grow up in a culture understanding which drugs do what, which drugs can be used safely, which ones are harmful and addictive and so on…all of these. I think it is the most important thing we could do to change the world today.

But don’t you think addictions would increase?

No I don’t think so; addictions would dramatically decrease. That’s the point. I will tell you why. In Britain before the 1971 drugs law, there were only 17,000 heroin addicts in Britain. They could all get prescriptions from their doctor and many were able to live reasonably normal lives. When the new law was imposed on us by the USA this stopped, and addicts had to get their drugs from criminals. As a consequence we now have countless hundreds of thousands of addicts. We don’t know how many, where they are, and they cause huge levels of crime and distress. Many die because the heroin they get is unclean and unpredictable. The problem is caused not primarily by the drug itself but by making it illegal. We could avoid all that by legalizing recreational drugs and educating people about it.

As a growing community of freethinkers, we encounter many people who think there just might be some truth in some paranormal phenomenon like telepathy or ESP. How do you suggest we talk to them without coming across as ‘closed-minded’ people?

Oh that is too difficult. I always get very angry. Only thing I can say is ask for evidence for their claims.

Thank you, Dr.Blackmore, It was a pleasure talking to you.

Share This Article:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Diigo

This post was written by:

- who has written 12 posts on Nirmukta.

8 Comments

  • Prof. V.N.K.Kumar

    ” Part of the answer is teaching children comparative religion. When my two children were small, I told them about Buddhism one day, Christianity one day, Islam another day and they said ‘Oh they believe that! They believe that! And obviously it can’t be all true.’ That simple conclusion starts a general scientific approach and scientific enquiry develops….”

    I liked this answer very much. She is such a sincere seeker of truth that when she found out that Parapsychology is not valid, she gave it up instead of sticking to it and defending it like all the others who keep justifying the pseudosciences.

  • Its really amazing to hear from someone who has spent years herself into this thing and shared her experience.

    I think it would be amazing if Nirmukta shares how we can eliminate and recognize the cognitive pattern that leads to leap of faith or simply believing that doesn’t exist through her experience.

  • Geetha – Did you record the interview? When I started my career as a journalist, I too would just write everything down. But when I started using recording device, the piece came out so very different. Just a suggestion.

    Good interview. Cheers.

    • Thanks Udhav. We did record – the initial plan was for a podcast but the audio quality was not very good.

  • i appreciate the honesty of Susan. and u geetha a journalist in making ! congrats .a job well done.

  • Men like Dr.Deepak Chopra mix a few words from modern sceince with words from Hindu scriptures and declare “That you are eternity ” or “quantum self is immortal” and his books are sold in millions. Beleif in supernatural can not be eradicated unless children in primary stage are enabled to think rationally.

  • What does she have to say abt the research being done by Rupert Sheldrake on Telepathy, especially when some of it does get published in peer reviewed journals.

    • Captain Mandrake

      JustCurious,

      **What does she have to say abt the research being done by Rupert Sheldrake on Telepathy, especially when some of it does get published in peer reviewed journals.**

      She says that though he was trained as a scientist his claims are wrong as they have no evidence to back them up. You can read about her take on his ideas in the link below.

      http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/feb/04/morphic-paranormal-science-sheldrake

      She concludes that though his ideas are wrong his books continue to sell because people want to believe that there is something (spirits, souls, afterlife) out there. I think the problem is the lack of critical thinking abilities.

      Anyway just curious, which paper of his about telepathy are you talking about?

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. Please see our commenting guidelines

Trackbacks